– Advertisement –

Who is Leonid Radvinsky? Leonid Radvinsky videos and photographs are Viral on Twitter and Reddit. Several explosive lawsuits claim that OnlyF wiped out rivals in the online porn industry by bribing Meta employees to add thousands of porn stars on terrorist watch lists. Allegedly, adult performers whose Instagram accounts were wrongly classified as dangerous content lost all of their earnings because they were unable to promote their businesses. Follow For More Updates at Worldrapiddnews.com

The lawsuit claims that Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and other platforms “blocked” sellers of objectionable pictures. It was revealed in the indictment that “unrelated to terrorism” accounts were also among those hacked. As adult performer Alana Evans told The Post, “I was incensed when I discovered that my content would be on the horror watch list.” Evans is one of the plaintiffs in the California complaint along with Kelly Pierce and others.

The Global Forum on Internet Counter-Terrorism (GIFCT), a non-profit organisation tasked with eliminating recordings of mass murders and films from social media platforms, allegedly includes Evans and others on a database of terrorist accounts. Extra scary material being widely available. The lawsuit claims that after adult performers utilising rival sites voluntarily registered with GIFCT’s registry, traffic to those sites dropped. Meanwhile, OnlyF’s popularity and earnings grew as more people discovered the site.

– Advertisement –

Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman represented plaintiffs in lawsuits filed against Meta and OnlyF. Attorneys claim to have obtained a list of over 21,000 Instagram accounts that were wrongly labelled as probable terrorists, according to documents filed in the California Supreme Court and not previously disclosed.

– Advertisement –

David Azar, a partner at Milberg, recently told The Washington Post that his firm wants Meta and GIFCT to “open up” their archives so that they can find out “if our clients or their material exists.” in the form of a database containing information about terrorists and where to find it. Take another exit. “

– Advertisement –

OnlyF released a statement to The Washington Post saying, “We are aware that these complaints have been filed. To our knowledge, no proof exists to back up these claims. The defendants have publicly stated that the allegations against them are groundless, and Meta did not answer to our request for comment, but the business did say it had reviewed the allegations of bribery against it and found no evidence that the terror database had been misused.

“These accusations are baseless, and we will address them, if necessary, as part of the litigation,” Meta said. However, GIFCT did tell the BBC that it was “unaware of any evidence to substantiate the argument presented in the dispute between two unrelated parties,” suggesting that it had no comment on The Washington Post’s claims.

According to the plaintiffs, the scheme began in 2018 when an employee at Meta, possibly the CEO, accepted a bribe from OnlyF. GIFCT responded, “Our ongoing efforts to strengthen transparency and governance of the GIFCT hash-sharing database are the result of considerable consultation with our stakeholders and have nothing to do with these assertions.”

– Advertisement –